Ether 3:98 and the recent impeachment and acquittal of the US President by Congress

----- Forwarded Message -----
From: Dwight Burford
dpburford@all4liberty.net


Ether 3:98 and the recent impeachment and acquittal of the US President by Congress

What does Ether 3:98 (RLDS) have to do with the recent impeachment and acquittal of the US President by Congress?

“Wherefore the Lord commandeth you, when ye shall see these things come among you, that ye shall awake to a sense of your awful situation, because of this secret combination which shall be among you, or wo be unto it, because of the blood of them who have been slain; for they cry from the dust for vengeance upon it, and also upon those who build it up.” (Ether 3:98)

With this verse in mind, now consider how it was charged that the President defied the foreign policy of the United States. For a refresher on this charge, here are links to summations of the charge by one of the President’s lawyers and why this charge actually defies the US constitution regarding the setting of US foreign policy.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r5HptvtT4KU&feature=youtu.be&t=9410
(short version, < 30 sec. starting here)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ds3Kye2QHTU&feature=youtu.be&t=1097
(more complete version, 2.5 min starting here)

In light of the fact that it is the President’s constitutional responsibility to set US foreign policy, who then would charge a US president of defying established US foreign policy? Established by whom? Could it be that there is another entity or group of people who think it is their role and responsibility to do so?

While I have not read all of it, the answers to this question may very well be found in the attached book, RULERS OF EVIL, Useful Knowledge About Governing Bodies, by F. TUPPER SAUSSY (ISBN 0-9673768-0-7). Here is a quote from pages 1 through 4 of this book. Although the material is somewhat dated (having a 1999 copyright date), it raises some rather interesting but troubling trends based on the information presented in it, beginning with the quote below.

“…What Brown had learned from Carl Bernstein I had discovered
for myself over several years of private investigation: the papacy
really does run United States foreign policy, and always has. Yes,
Bernstein noted that the leading American players behind the
Reagan/Vatican conspiracy, to a man, were “devout Roman

Catholics” – namely,

· William Casey, Director, CIA
· Richard Allen, National Security Advisor
· Judge William Clark, National Security Advisor
· Alexander Haig, Secretary of State
· Vernon Walters, Ambassador-at-Large
· William Wilson, Ambassador to the Vatican State

“But the reporter neglected to mention that the entire Senate
Foreign Relations committee was governed by Roman Catholics,
as well. Specifically, Senators

· Joseph Biden, Subcommittee on European Affairs
· Paul Sarbanes, International Economic Policy, Trade, Oceans, and Environment
· Daniel P. Moynihan, Near Eastern and South Asian Affairs
· John Kerry, Terrorism, Narcotics, and International Communications
· and...
· Christopher Dodd, Western Hemisphere and Peace Corps Affairs

“Bernstein would have been wandering off-point to list the
Roman Catholic leaders of American domestic policy, such as
Senate majority leader George Mitchell and Speaker of the House
Tom Foley.

“In fact, when the holy alliance story hit the stands, there was
virtually no arena of federal legislative activity, according to The
1992 World Almanac of US Politics, that was not directly controlled
by a Roman Catholic senator or representative. The committees
and subcommittees of the United States Senate and House of Representatives
governing commerce, communications and telecommunications,
energy, medicine, health, education and welfare,
human services, consumer protection, finance and financial institutions,
transportation, labor and unemployment, hazardous materials,
taxation, bank regulation, currency and monetary policy,
oversight of the Federal Reserve System, commodity prices, rents
services, small business administration, urban affairs, European
affairs, Near Eastern 6k South Asian affairs, terrorism/narcotics/
international communications, international economic/trade/
oceans/environmental policy, insurance, housing, community
development, federal loan guarantees, economic stabilization
measures (including wage and price controls), gold and precious
metals transactions, agriculture, animal and forestry industries,
rural issues, nutrition, price supports, Food for Peace, agricultural
exports, soil conservation, irrigation, stream channelization, flood control,
minority enterprise, environment and pollution, appropriations,
defense, foreign operations, vaccines, drug labeling and
packaging, drug and alcohol abuse, inspection and certification of
fish and processed food, use of vitamins and saccharin, national
health insurance proposals, human services, legal services, family
relations, the arts and humanities, the handicapped, and aging –
in other words, virtually every aspect of secular life in America –
came under the chairmanship of one of these Roman Catholic
laypersons:

Frank Annunzio
Joseph Biden
Silvio Conte
Kika De la Garza
John Dingell
Christopher Dodd
Vic Fazio
James Florio
Henry Gonzalez
Thomas Harkin
Edward Kennedy
John Kerry
John LaFalce
Patrick Leahy
Charles Luken
Edward Madigan
Edward Markey
Joseph McDade
Barbara Mikulski
George Miller
Daniel Moynihan
John Murtha
Mary Rose Oakar
David Obey
Claiborne Pell
Charles Rangel
Dan Rostenkowski
or Edward Roybal.

“Vatican Council IPs Constitution on the Church ( 1 9 6 4 ) instructs
politicians to use their secular offices to advance the cause of
Roman Catholicism. Catholic laypersons, “whoever they are, are
called upon to expend all their energy for the growth of the
Church and its continuous sanctification,” and “to make the
Church present and operative in those places and circumstances
where only through them can it become the salt of the earth” (IV,
3 3 ) . Vatican II further instructs all Catholics “by their competence
in secular disciplines and by their activity [to] vigorously contribute
their effort so that ... the goods of this world may be more
equitably distributed among all men, and may in their own way
be conducive to universal progress in human and Christian freedom
... and [to] remedy the customs and conditions of the world,
if they are an inducement to sin, so that they all may be conformed
to the norms of justice and may favor the practice of virtue rather
than hinder it” (IV, 3 6 ).”

'Rulers of Evil'
http://www.granddesignexposed.com/pdf/ROEpdf.pdf

If “the papacy really does run United States foreign policy” as this author asserts, then it would be understandable why Catholics and those in union with them would accuse this US President of defying the foreign policies they have set for the US. For a reality check, here are a few links to more current information on who actually is running the US government today:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Religious_affiliation_in_the_United_States_House_of_Representatives

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Religious_affiliation_in_the_United_States_Senate

with

https://www.house.gov/committees

https://www.pewforum.org/2019/01/03/faith-on-the-hill-116/

And regarding the supreme court:
https://religionnews.com/2018/07/12/why-catholics-and-jews-dominate-at-the-supreme-court/

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Demographics_of_the_Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States#The_shift_to_a_Catholic_majority,_and_non-Protestant_Court

Now consider how the current Speaker of the House is Catholic and that she is the one who has led the charge to impeach the President for defying the foreign policy of the United States (per one article of impeachment). As an illustration of her view, in the following short clip the Speaker shifts away from a question about her feelings toward the President and why they were impeaching him to an issue she wants the media to focus on, that of the President’s handling of US policy regarding “dreamers,” etc., arguably a foreign policy matter.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ar0yjBm2HTU
(approx. 1.5 min)

Could the decision to impeach this US president over such policy matters have come from anything other than a truly massive force or undercurrent in the government that has been produced by something rather sizable, such as a very large political force in the world today? Does this make the impeachment push some kind of turf war on a global level (because it is over foreign policy)?

Having these several quotes and source documents in mind, I would encourage you to once again read from the Book of Mormon, this time from the following verses:

Ether 3:93-102
I Nephi 3:217-237

To me, seeing what appears to be the fulfillment prophecy is rather stunning and effectual in punctuating the seriousness and soberness of the situation before us as noted in Ether 3:98.

Your thoughts?

Dwight Burford
dpburford@all4liberty.net